2009年5月13日星期三

tsinghua plan (new)


we disscuss with teacher, we conclude that the road system is done,and we put the buildings on our removed place to show the density which is needed, as the ratio is between 2.0_2.5 , we need to plant some tower,However, this is not proper for this site, we will design more precisely


finally I want to say that there 4 displine we (chinese group & japanese
group) should obey.




1.we should draw a agreement that we use the same road
system.
2.as the road have divided the site into sevral parts ,we need to draw a
agreement of the function of each part
3.we should obey the same density of each part
4.the protected part must be the same region.




so the form of each part does not need to be the same, each group(japanese & chinnese) could appear different.

our proposal






This is the idea we chose.
This idea is based on the idea we proposed at may 12th.


tsinghua's proposal

today's(5/13) esquisse in Japan

Our teacher worried that we don't agree on our master plan and china's master plan.
However, he evaluated our proposal interesting.
Also, he said that we should go on with our proposal and to represent more simply.
We will upload the proposal on blog later.
And , We have Mr.Matsubara's esquisse on satuday,so we have to decide master plan in a hurry.
We have no time really!! Let's draw up a better master plan togather with keeping in close contact.
Tomorrow , I hope for constructive discussion on skype.

about our new and final MP

Today the teacher suggested we 4 proposals to be combined to a new one. Because although our forms are different, but our goal and concept is kind of the same.
Just now we've discussed about the new and final MP. But we need time to draw it and make SketchUp models. Maybe tomorrow can show you.
Is that okay?
How about your teacher? Did he give any suggestion?

Which one did you choose ?

please tell us the Tsinghua's proposal you decided at today's meeting as soon as possible.




2009年5月12日星期二